Why do we Think in Terms of Power? – Oct. 16, 2019
Why do we think in terms of power
when we seek change
but isn’t change facilitated
through efficient action
so why then
everywhere I look
do I find the struggle for power
power over a relationship
more powerful products
supposed to make things better
I think power should not then be the goal
instead we should seek
so that change can be made
with less work
Because that which is altered
is characterized by how it is changed
control is born from power
solutions are born from efficient action
Note: I was vacuuming in my apartment today. I find cleaning to be an enjoyable, theraputic activity. Especially vacuuming. The loud wirring of the machine drowns out the sounds which would otherwise distract me. I get excited when the vacuum head passes over the carpet- bristles spinning, pummeling the carpet so as to shake free the dust, dirt, sand, and anything else that might be embedded in its fibers and the sound of dense particles strike against the plastic housing before being whisked away into the bag.
Today it made me think back to those infomercials on television. The ones that air late at night and last for half on an hour, sometimes longer. Even the brief ones, with their condensed messages seem to convince the viewer that the newer, more powerful product is best. It’s exactly what you need to change that dirty, grimy carpet into a clean- like new surface. More power. Anything else just isn’t good enough. Everything seemed to be about more power. A more powerful motor. A stronger detergent, or cleaning agent. I always found the use of the word “agent” interesting. In a post Cold War time it carries a certain weight.
So many things in America, I suppose the whole world round, seem to be about achieving more power. Power seemed to be what made gaining control of a situation easier, so that you could change things to your liking with greater ease. That all sounds correct, doesn’t it?
However, as I was in the process of handling a machine I guess my mind was thinking about existence differently. I was thinking about the mechanics of it all. In physics power seems to be simply but one factor. Yes, it is essential to solving a problem, but increasing power often has consequences. So what else can be used to bring about a solution to a physical problem other than a mere increase in force? The efficiency in which that force is applied and therefore how the energy of that force is transfered through the situation.
Isn’t that a better thing to focus on? In society I witness such a focus on power. People seem to create situations simply to bring about a power struggle so that there can be a victor and a loser, with the victor determining how things will be changed. Control is the prize. Power, the sought after tool. Yet the victor/loser dynamic often creates an unstable result. People become defensive. They lose trust or become dense, or brittle in their defeat. Systems (or solutions) which seem to focus on efficiency often result in a better balance of power. There is a more consistent transfer of power between components.
Maybe this is what is meant in Taoism- where there is such reverence seen in water, in a ruler whose hand is unknown, in the willingness to relinquish control, and in the notion that only the grasping hand can lose hold of something.
End Note: These days I think in short, sequential bursts. This might be what explains the style or format (if you can call it that) of my poetry. It might be that I have always thought that way. I’m not sure. The poem above may not even be a poem. It could be a sentence or sentences that carry on too long, eschewing grammar and punctuation. I’m not sure I know what makes something a poem. I think my “poems” are mere how my brain takes notes of its own thoughts. All I know is that I can more quickly make record of a thought in the poetic format you see above, than were I to try and write paragrahs. Those only seem to come later.